Skip to main content

Sentencing

Second Circuit Upholds Removal and Illegal Re-Entry Law Despite Racist Roots

Ecuadoran national challenges his conviction for illegal reentry into the United States on the grounds that his initial removal was unlawful and the prohibition on reentry was enacted for super racist reasons. Second Circuit: His initial removal was lawful. And though the law's legislative history contains some shocking comments—heck, one legislator observed in 1952, "though I am not a follower of Hitler . . . there is something to it"—those views can't be attributed to all of Congress.

Leslie E. Scott Named Director of National Sentencing Resource Counsel

Leslie E. Scott has been selected to serve as the National Sentencing Resource Counsel’s new Director. Scott joined SRC in 2022. Prior to joining SRC, Scott worked in academia as an associate professor at the University of Detroit, Mercy School of Law. Scott also served our community as an assistant federal defender in the Western District of New York and a law clerk in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and the D.C. Court of Appeals. Scott is an alumnus of the American University, Washington College of Law, and the University of Michigan.

Government Accountability Office Releases Data on Federally Sentenced Non-Citizens

Of the 64,124 cases reported to the United States Sentencing Commission in fiscal year 2023, 21,504 involved non-U.S. citizens. Non-U.S. citizens accounted for 33.7% of all individuals sentenced in fiscal year 2023.

This Government Accountability Office report provides publicly available information on incarcerations of non-citizens in the U.S., not just federal facilities.

D.C Circuit Upholds 'Cowboys for Trump' Leader Jan. 6 Conviction

Federal law prohibits entering "a restricted building or grounds," a term that is defined to include any restricted area "where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting." January 6 protestor convicted under the law argues the gov't was required to show not only that he knew the area was restricted, but that he knew it was restricted because VP Mike Pence was there. D.C. Circuit: Everything points to knowingly trespassing being enough.