Prosecutorial immunity is notoriously hard to overcome—so we're ecstatic to report that a Michigan appeals court ruled that Wayne County prosecutor Dennis M. Doherty is not entitled to immunity and must face a lawsuit for filing baseless felony charges against Robert Reeves—all because Reeves had the nerve to challenge the county’s civil forfeiture practices.
Oklahoma City police detain driver whose passenger is wanted for failing to appear in court. The passenger is arrested—but then officers hang around for another ten minutes, until a drug-sniffing dog finally shows up, takes a lap around the car, and alerts. Driver: Sniff happens but this delay was unjustified. Suppress the evidence? District court: No (and sentences him to 84 months in prison). Tenth Circuit: Yes (and vacates the sentence and conviction).
New Orleans judge Paul Bonin tells pretrial criminal defendants to pay up to $300/month to a private, for-profit ankle-monitoring company or stay in jail. Judge does not tell defendants that the company is owned by his former law partner, who regularly donated to the judge's judicial campaigns (including an unpaid loan). Judge also does not tell defendants that other companies are available. Judge does, however, threaten jailing at the company's behest solely for failure to pay.
A man freely chats with cops about his involvement in a riverside gunfight, admitting that he fired shots during the attack. Two years later, at trial, he claims that his participation was under duress; the prosecutor reminds the jury that this defense is a "brand-new story" told for the first time at trial. The man is convicted. Tenth Circuit: And that's a Doyle violation.
A Schrödinger’s motion that has vexed habeas practitioners: How long must a case gather dust in state court before I can seek federal habeas? Well, an Indiana man convicted of murder files a petition for post-conviction relief in state court, which proceeds to do absolutely nothing with the case for six years. Yikes! Indiana: Apologize for case languishing? No. It was the man's fault! And it was the pandemic! And it was a complicated case!
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Case v. Montana, No. 24-625 (June 2, 2025) (cert. granted), to decide “whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.”
Navy investigators get a warrant to seize—and only seize—a sailor's phone. They search it anyway and find the bad things, but the district court suppresses the evidence. On appeal, the prosecution pleads "good faith" reliance on a defective warrant. Fourth Circuit: The warrant wasn't defective. You just didn't follow it. The good faith exception "is not a panacea that can save the Government when all remaining facts and law fail." Bugger off. Dismissal affirmed.
Oklahoma cops seize a 24-year-old's iPhone when he surfaces with a missing 14-year-old and get a state warrant to search for anything on the phone that might be evidence of any crime. Yikes! They uncover child porn and hand the trove to federal officers, who apply for a federal warrant using that evidence.
Over the course of 10 years, Louisville, Ky. man is indicted and re-indicted six times on 34 charges including murder, rape, kidnapping—all over the same nexus of events that took place in 2004. He spends over seven years in prison. But wait! The state drops the murder charge in 2015 and then all the rest of the charges in 2016. He missed out on the chance to share births, funerals, and time with his five children, along with the opportunity to “fall in love, to marry and enjoy the fundamental freedom … of a human being.” Malicious prosecution?
One of the most-read novellas of all time, Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, clocks in at, depending on what edition you pick up, around 120 pages. Not to be outdone, the 15-judge en banc Fourth Circuit provides 126 pages of eight non-precedential concurrences, plus one dissent, in addressing whether geofence warrants are unconstitutional.